Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-31095][BUILD] Upgrade netty-all to 4.1.47.Final #27869

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[SPARK-31095][BUILD] Upgrade netty-all to 4.1.47.Final #27869

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun commented Mar 10, 2020

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to bring the bug fixes from the latest netty-all.

Why are the changes needed?

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Pass the Jenkins with the existing tests.

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun changed the title [SPARK-31095][BUILD] Upgrade netty-all to 4.1.44.Final [SPARK-31095][BUILD] Upgrade netty-all to 4.1.47.Final Mar 10, 2020
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 11, 2020

Test build #119633 has finished for PR 27869 at commit b3a3ba1.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 11, 2020

Test build #119634 has finished for PR 27869 at commit 9d8aa72.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member Author

Hi, @srowen and @HyukjinKwon .
Could you review this, please?

Copy link
Member

@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks okay.

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you so much, @HyukjinKwon ! Merged to master/3.0.

dongjoon-hyun added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2020
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to bring the bug fixes from the latest netty-all.

### Why are the changes needed?

- 4.1.47.Final: https://github.com/netty/netty/milestone/222?closed=1 (15 patches or issues)
- 4.1.46.Final: https://github.com/netty/netty/milestone/221?closed=1 (80 patches or issues)
- 4.1.45.Final: https://github.com/netty/netty/milestone/220?closed=1 (23 patches or issues)
- 4.1.44.Final: https://github.com/netty/netty/milestone/218?closed=1 (113 patches or issues)
- 4.1.43.Final: https://github.com/netty/netty/milestone/217?closed=1 (63 patches or issues)

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Pass the Jenkins with the existing tests.

Closes #27869 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-31095.

Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
(cherry picked from commit 93def95)
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun deleted the SPARK-31095 branch March 11, 2020 00:53
@yhuai
Copy link
Contributor

yhuai commented Mar 11, 2020

What is the reason we merge this into branch-3.0 after the code freeze? What bug are you trying to fix? I do not think we should bringing more than 200 changes from netty into a release branch without detailed justification.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

Actually, yeah. What about we merge into the master only as the RC for 3.0 will be going to out soon? It legitimately includes bug fixes from the dependency but might be better to avoid porting these considering the timing of the release window.

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member Author

dongjoon-hyun commented Mar 11, 2020

Hi, @yucai and @HyukjinKwon .
This is bug fixes like the following.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

Thanks for clarifying it, @dongjoon-hyun. Looks we should backport as it includes CVE.

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you, @HyukjinKwon .

@yhuai
Copy link
Contributor

yhuai commented Mar 11, 2020

thank you @dongjoon-hyun

dongjoon-hyun added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2020
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a backport of #27869.

This PR aims to bring the bug fixes from the latest netty-all.

### Why are the changes needed?

- 4.1.47.Final: https://github.com/netty/netty/milestone/222?closed=1 (15 patches or issues)
- 4.1.46.Final: https://github.com/netty/netty/milestone/221?closed=1 (80 patches or issues)
- 4.1.45.Final: https://github.com/netty/netty/milestone/220?closed=1 (23 patches or issues)
- 4.1.44.Final: https://github.com/netty/netty/milestone/218?closed=1 (113 patches or issues)
- 4.1.43.Final: https://github.com/netty/netty/milestone/217?closed=1 (63 patches or issues)

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Pass the Jenkins with the existing tests.

Closes #27870 from dongjoon-hyun/netty.

Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
sjincho pushed a commit to sjincho/spark that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2020
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to bring the bug fixes from the latest netty-all.

### Why are the changes needed?

- 4.1.47.Final: https://github.com/netty/netty/milestone/222?closed=1 (15 patches or issues)
- 4.1.46.Final: https://github.com/netty/netty/milestone/221?closed=1 (80 patches or issues)
- 4.1.45.Final: https://github.com/netty/netty/milestone/220?closed=1 (23 patches or issues)
- 4.1.44.Final: https://github.com/netty/netty/milestone/218?closed=1 (113 patches or issues)
- 4.1.43.Final: https://github.com/netty/netty/milestone/217?closed=1 (63 patches or issues)

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Pass the Jenkins with the existing tests.

Closes apache#27869 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-31095.

Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
4 participants