ci: skip Nodeset enumerator test in valgrind #2209
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Since fixing #1952 I've wanted to revisit the valgrind suppressions to see what's left. I'm leaving only the suppressions I see for Ruby 2.7 and 3.0 startup (iseq_peephole_optimize).
flavorjones
force-pushed
the
flavorjones-skip-enumerator-in-valgrind
branch
from
778b2a0
to
6e98c79
Compare
|
Code Climate has analyzed commit 6e98c79 and detected 0 issues on this pull request. The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (80% is the threshold). This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 94.0%. View more on Code Climate. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since fixing #1952 I've wanted to revisit the valgrind suppressions to see what's left. I'm leaving only the suppressions I see for Ruby 2.7 and 3.0 startup (iseq_peephole_optimize), and I'm skipping the NodeSet enumerator test since I know it confuses valgrind.
This is an alternative to #2208.