Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: reduce valgrind suppressions #2208

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

flavorjones
Copy link
Member

Since fixing #1952 I've wanted to revisit the valgrind suppressions to
see what's left. These suppressions represent what I saw in docker
images on my dev machine:

  • on Ruby 2.7 and 3.0 startup (iseq_peephole_optimize)
  • enumerators seem to confuse Valgrind (mark_locations_array/gc_mark_stacked_objects)

@flavorjones flavorjones force-pushed the flavorjones-reset-valgrind-suppressions branch 2 times, most recently from 621dbb3 to 727cb31 Compare March 21, 2021 03:54
Since fixing #1952 I've wanted to revisit the valgrind suppressions to
see what's left. These suppressions represent what I saw in docker
images on my dev machine:

- on Ruby 2.7 and 3.0 startup (iseq_peephole_optimize)
- enumerators seem to confuse Valgrind (mark_locations_array/gc_mark_stacked_objects)
@flavorjones flavorjones force-pushed the flavorjones-reset-valgrind-suppressions branch from 727cb31 to c7b2df3 Compare March 21, 2021 21:17
@codeclimate
Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Mar 21, 2021

Code Climate has analyzed commit c7b2df3 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (80% is the threshold).

This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 94.0%.

View more on Code Climate.

@flavorjones
Copy link
Member Author

Closing in favor of #2209

@flavorjones flavorjones deleted the flavorjones-reset-valgrind-suppressions branch March 22, 2021 15:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant