Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Fix #9792] Fix false positive for Lint/Void cop #9796

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 17, 2021

Conversation

tejasbubane
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #9792


Before submitting the PR make sure the following are checked:

  • The PR relates to only one subject with a clear title and description in grammatically correct, complete sentences.
  • Wrote good commit messages.
  • Commit message starts with [Fix #issue-number] (if the related issue exists).
  • Feature branch is up-to-date with master (if not - rebase it).
  • Squashed related commits together.
  • Added tests.
  • Ran bundle exec rake default. It executes all tests and runs RuboCop on its own code.
  • Added an entry (file) to the changelog folder named {change_type}_{change_description}.md if the new code introduces user-observable changes. See changelog entry format for details.

lib/rubocop/cop/lint/void.rb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
koic added a commit to koic/rubocop that referenced this pull request May 14, 2021
Follow rubocop#9796 (comment).

This PR makes `InternalAffairs/ExampleDescription` aware of descriptions
starting with `handles` and `works` when using `expect_no_offenses`.
@tejasbubane tejasbubane requested a review from koic May 16, 2021 13:58
@tejasbubane
Copy link
Contributor Author

@koic Changed as per your comments.

@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ def check_var(node)
end

def check_literal(node)
return if !node.literal? || node.xstr_type?
return if !node.literal? || node.xstr_type? || node.range_type?
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder why literal? doesn't cover them. I think they weren't immutable or something like this, but my memory on the subject is fuzzy.

@bbatsov bbatsov merged commit 40d0970 into rubocop:master May 17, 2021
@tejasbubane tejasbubane deleted the fix-9792 branch May 17, 2021 06:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Lint/Void false positive result
3 participants