Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Fix #9257] Fix false positive for Style/SymbolProc when the block uses a variable from outside the block #9259

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 19, 2020

Conversation

dvandersluis
Copy link
Member

The changes in #9127 to keep the node pattern DRY accidentally broke the check that the lvar matches the argument name.

Fixes #9257.


Before submitting the PR make sure the following are checked:

  • The PR relates to only one subject with a clear title and description in grammatically correct, complete sentences.
  • Wrote good commit messages.
  • Commit message starts with [Fix #issue-number] (if the related issue exists).
  • Feature branch is up-to-date with master (if not - rebase it).
  • Squashed related commits together.
  • Added tests.
  • Ran bundle exec rake default. It executes all tests and runs RuboCop on its own code.
  • Added an entry (file) to the changelog folder named {change_type}_{change_description}.md if the new code introduces user-observable changes. See changelog entry format for details.

… block uses a variable from outside the block.
@dvandersluis
Copy link
Member Author

The circle build passed but didn't update the PR for some reason.

@marcandre marcandre merged commit 65b3814 into rubocop:master Dec 19, 2020
@marcandre
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good, thanks for this 👍

(send (lvar _var) $_))
{
(block $#symbol_proc_receiver? $(args (arg _var)) (send (lvar _var) $_))
(numblock $#symbol_proc_receiver? $1 (send (lvar :_1) $_))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I made a double take at $1! 😆

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah it’s needed to balance each option in the {} but not actually used for anything (the capture for block is though so it’s needed)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's what I figured 😆

@dvandersluis dvandersluis deleted the issue/9257 branch January 18, 2021 20:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Style/SymbolProc false positive with unused argument
2 participants