New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[5.x] Yarn v3 for stable webpacker 5.x gem #3098
Merged
Merged
Changes from 8 commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5672b93
Yarn v3 for stable webpacker 5.x
pedrofurtado d4ef57d
Update Gemfile-rails-edge
pedrofurtado ea131c9
Update Gemfile-rails-edge
pedrofurtado 736cf20
Update ruby.yml
pedrofurtado 9801d4c
Update helper_test.rb
pedrofurtado 81dc763
Update helper_test.rb
pedrofurtado d6d82aa
Update helper_test.rb
pedrofurtado 29d26e6
Update check_yarn.rake
pedrofurtado 565ccc2
Update ruby.yml
pedrofurtado de55be5
Update Gemfile-rails-edge
pedrofurtado 3608ede
Update helper_test.rb
pedrofurtado File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why did you remove these versions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@guillaumebriday Because Rails 7.0.0-alpha (edge) does not support ruby 2.5 and 2.6, only 2.7+ 馃憤
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think so these removes can be done in other PR separately, only that change context to rails 7. What do you think about that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes I think it's should not be in this PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Considering that branch
5-x-stable
does not receive frequent changes, and that this PR is small enough to be understood well (despite CI fixes be together with adding of Yarn v3), can we merge it? 馃嵒There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@pedrofurtado sounds like the preferred way forward is for you to pull the workflow changes out of this PR, focus it 馃挴 on just bringing yarn v3 support in for a quick merge....
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PR splitted in two: this that provides yarn 3 support, and other that fixes CI ( #3106 )