Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improved Django settings handling #287
Improved Django settings handling #287
Changes from 6 commits
36fc49f
26f3af3
21487b4
c7730fa
08ad9de
f7b556b
aa7f80b
7721691
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 for adding the TODOs as separate issues so we don't forget about them. Interestingly enough the pylint test job in Travis should be catching this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed - I had initially not bothered as I had planned to immediately address them in a new PR but I got distracted / didn't get time. Therefore I've made #289 and #288
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could benefit from a comment either here or on the doc-string text and/or the foreignkey module to explicitly state why
foreignkey.add_transform()
isn't called like for the other modules.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a module-level docstring explaining this already which I think is sufficient: https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint-django/blob/feature/improve-django-settings-handling/pylint_django/transforms/__init__.py#L1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I also added this issue as a discussion for moving all transforms/augmentations into a checker rather than being loaded immediately by the plugin: #290
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The reason for this line & the reason why it is failing is the same - it tries installing pylint-django and all of its dependencies from tartballs. One of them is either new or stopped shipping tarballs, and only has wheel packages. See 10 lines below for how we deal with another package which doesn't ship wheels.
My preferred way for dealing with this is to find which package is the one not providing tarballs and
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For now I'll accept this in our own CI while I track down which dependency is the guilty party - I am fairly sure it's clikit and I'll raise a PR/issue there if that's true or as you suggest, explicitly install it ourselves.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I created a new issue to separate this out: #291