Subclass validator each item docs

changes/1566-samueldeklund.md

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Subclass validators do not run when referencing a `List` field defined in a parent class when `each_item=True`. Added an example to the docs illustrating this.

docs/examples/validators_subclass_each_item.py

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+from typing import List
+from pydantic import BaseModel, ValidationError, validator
+
+
+class ParentModel(BaseModel):
+    names: List[str]
+
+
+class ChildModel(ParentModel):
+    @validator('names', each_item=True)
+    def check_names_not_empty(cls, v):
+        assert v != '', 'Empty strings are not allowed.'
+        return v
+
+
+# This will NOT raise a ValidationError because the validator was not called
+try:
+    child = ChildModel(names=['Alice', 'Bob', 'Eve', ''])
+except ValidationError as e:
+    print(e)
+else:
+    print('No ValidationError caught.')
+
+
+class ChildModel2(ParentModel):
+    @validator('names')
+    def check_names_not_empty(cls, v):
+        for name in v:
+            assert name != '', 'Empty strings are not allowed.'
+        return v
+
+
+try:
+    child = ChildModel2(names=['Alice', 'Bob', 'Eve', ''])
+except ValidationError as e:
+    print(e)

docs/usage/validators.md

@@ -50,6 +50,16 @@ A few more things to note:
 * passing `each_item=True` will result in the validator being applied to individual values
   (e.g. of `List`, `Dict`, `Set`, etc.), rather than the whole object
 
+## Subclass Validators and `each_item`
+
+If using a validator with a subclass that references a `List` type field on a parent class, using `each_item=True` will
+cause the validator not to run; instead, the list must be iterated over programatically.
+
+```py
+{!.tmp_examples/validators_subclass_each_item.py!}
+```
+_(This script is complete, it should run "as is")_
+
 ## Validate Always
 
 For performance reasons, by default validators are not called for fields when a value is not supplied.