Add multiple workbox bundles to allowed packages

[NivaldoFarias]

Resolving the issue mentioned at the workbox-build PR.

• CI job error

[andrewbranch]

Are all of these direct dependencies of something in DT? Transitive dependencies don’t need to be listed.

[NivaldoFarias]

Are all of these direct dependencies of something in DT? Transitive dependencies don’t need to be listed.

Yes, unfortunately enough. Though that got me thinking, since the dependencies at DT workbox-sw@4.3.2 points to other workbox-_ DT packages (most are at @4.3.2 aswell) that will be removed in favour of newer and bundled types by the original package, then this may be a case (as mentioned in DT's README) of adding the removed @types/workbox-_ packages to the dependencies list.

Then, the right solution would be to add the @types/ packages instead of the original ones to the allowed packages .txt file. If this is correct and is approved, I will update both PRs.

[NivaldoFarias]

In order to reference the type declarations used inside the DT customize-cra and workbox-sw packages, all of these @types/ packages need to be included in the allowed packages list. The dependencies inside the mentioned DT packages refer to older, to-be-removed DT workbox-_ packages.

see PR to remove old workbox-_ packages