generated from kubernetes/kubernetes-template-project
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 432
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: reuse gc name in GatewayClassObservedGenerationBump conformance #1645
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ | ||
apiVersion: gateway.networking.k8s.io/v1beta1 | ||
kind: GatewayClass | ||
metadata: | ||
name: gatewayclass-observed-generation-bump | ||
name: "{GATEWAY_CLASS_NAME}" | ||
spec: | ||
controllerName: "{GATEWAY_CONTROLLER_NAME}" | ||
description: "old" |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's some previous context here: #1586 (comment). There was also more discussion in the community meeting around that time.
I had 2 main concerns:
Making this change would go against 1 thought it would help with 2.
Eventually we agreed that these could be added if they were guarded by a feature gate and not part of the default test suite. @dprotaso can likely add some more context here as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @robscott! I think EG should support the multiple-GC model, and it makes sence : )
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah this test purposely mutates a second gateway class to test the observed generation is bumped in the status conditions when it is reconciled.
I believe changing the name to the default name
GATEWAY_CLASS_NAME
will (may?) break other tests since it's clearing params etc.