Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correctly handle <:inverse> named block #1296

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Apr 20, 2021
Merged

Conversation

wagenet
Copy link
Contributor

@wagenet wagenet commented Apr 20, 2021

No description provided.

@chancancode
Copy link
Contributor

We will need to make sure it works with the checks for duplicate blocks and stuff (it normally checks that you can’t have two blocks with the same name, but we need to make sure you can’t have both else and inverse here).

@wagenet
Copy link
Contributor Author

wagenet commented Apr 20, 2021

@chancancode it did not work, but I added a new assertion.

@chancancode chancancode merged commit 3874a63 into master Apr 20, 2021
@chancancode chancancode deleted the fix-inverse-named-block branch April 20, 2021 19:21
This was referenced May 21, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants