Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update go-sectorbuilder and golangci-lint #3650

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Nov 12, 2019
Merged

Conversation

frrist
Copy link
Member

@frrist frrist commented Nov 12, 2019

Motivation

After updating to go 1.13 there have been some issues with go mod and the package/version: github.com/golangci/golangci-lint v1.17.1.
see for more details #3488 (comment)

Proposed changes

This PR updates go-filecoin to use github.com/golangci/golangci-lint v1.21.0 and also updates go-sectorbilder to a commit with the same linter version

Copy link
Contributor

@acruikshank acruikshank left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@frrist frrist self-assigned this Nov 12, 2019
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Nov 12, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #3650 into master will decrease coverage by <1%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #3650   +/-   ##
======================================
- Coverage      47%     47%   -1%     
======================================
  Files         270     270           
  Lines       17227   17227           
======================================
- Hits         8155    8147    -8     
- Misses       7968    7973    +5     
- Partials     1104    1107    +3

@frrist
Copy link
Member Author

frrist commented Nov 12, 2019

@acruikshank can you confirm this builds/WAE on your computer, sometimes CI gives false positives on changes like this.

@frrist frrist merged commit cf934ac into master Nov 12, 2019
@frrist frrist deleted the fix/update-golangci-lint branch November 12, 2019 18:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants