Stale label github action #5405
Conversation
|
Related: dask/dask#8244 |
| exempt-issue-labels: 'good intro to dask,good first issue,Good First Issue,good second issue,feature request' | ||
| #exempt-pr-labels: 'awaiting-approval,work-in-progress' | ||
| exempt-draft-pr: true | ||
| start-date: '2020-04-18T00:00:00Z' # ignore before this date, ISO 8601 or RFC 2822 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why would we want to ignore tickets before this date? @jsignell do you know why this is in here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess the idea was not to apply them to all of history, but only going forward. Based on the conversation in the dev meeting, seems like we are ok with letting the bot do more.
| days-before-close: -1 | ||
| stale-issue-label: 'needs attention' | ||
| stale-pr-label: 'needs attention' | ||
| exempt-issue-labels: 'good intro to dask,good first issue,Good First Issue,good second issue,feature request' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| exempt-issue-labels: 'good intro to dask,good first issue,Good First Issue,good second issue,feature request' | |
| exempt-issue-labels: 'good first issue,good second issue,feature,flaky test, enhancement' |
Some of the labels in here do not exist
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yeah I imagine they either used to exist or they exist on dask but not distributed.
|
@GenevieveBuckley based off the conversation here: dask/community#60 (comment) we are planning on reviving this work. Is it ok with you if we push to your branch? |
@jsignell yes, it is always ok for you or other maintainers to push to my branches 😄 Go right ahead! I'm sure it's also be a lot more time-efficient in this particular case, too. |
As discussed here we want a bot to automatically label stale issues in the repository, in the least obnoxious way possible.
This PR introduces a yml file for the github actions/stale, to run automatically on a regular interval.
Tests added / passedPassespre-commit run --all-files