New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Code that could get some coverage #3181
Comments
The TypeConverter class, LogLevelTypeConverter, has 88% code coverage via the test LogLevelConvertTest in LogLevelTests. I don't see it in your coverage report so I'm wondering if it actually need more coverage added or if it could already be considered complete. I suppose it might benefit to move the test into its own dedicated test class to make the coverage more obvious. Also, could you elaborate on what the these requested test cases mean:
|
I have to check that, maybe it's done already indeed.
Thanks in advance! |
Took the two easy ones. I might come back and try some other classes later this week. |
Parts with some lower test coverage
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: