New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
various formulae: style fixes #80302
Conversation
060be79
to
f1a16f1
Compare
I'd rather run CI on this. Not all of these changes are obviously NFC (no functional change). Though maybe we can wait till the CI queue is less backed up? Unless this is urgent, anyway. |
Not urgent and the CI queue being backed up was my main concern. I'll mark this as "do not merge" until we get a chance to run CI. |
Most of these are improvements but some of them are... not. |
I'll rebase this once the Pillow-related PRs are merged. I'll also manually edit the ones that autocorrect spoilt, to the best of my ability 😅. |
f1a16f1
to
4cd724d
Compare
ARM:
None have ARM bottles, so this is expected. |
I'm fine with using |
ARM Big Sur:
✅ All expected. Intel Big Sur:
🟡 Need to check Catalina:
✅ 1 false positive, others expected. Mojave:
✅ 1 network issue, others expected. |
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ class Ocaml < Formula | |||
|
|||
pour_bottle? do | |||
# The ocaml compilers embed prefix information in weird ways that the default | |||
# brew detection doesn't find, and so needs to be explicitly blacklisted. | |||
# brew detection doesn't find, and so needs to be explicitly blocked. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm unsure why infer
failed to build on Intel Big Sur. It was built/tested only because of ocaml
, which has a syntax-only change in a comment.
If we can ignore this failure, the PR should be good to merge, I think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Works for me. Thanks @nandahkrishna!
Rebased and merged. Thanks for the feedback everyone! |
brew install --build-from-source <formula>
, where<formula>
is the name of the formula you're submitting?brew test <formula>
, where<formula>
is the name of the formula you're submitting?brew audit --strict <formula>
(after doingbrew install --build-from-source <formula>
)? If this is a new formula, does it passbrew audit --new <formula>
?This PR is required for Homebrew/brew#11626. Some changes were made with
brew style --fix
, but others had to be done manually (where autocorrect wouldn't work properly).Formulae where the changes weren't only style changes (but straightforward), I tried to build and test the formula locally. If we'd rather run CI here, I'll remove the
CI-syntax-only
label.