Update actions package dependencies

[Dead2]

This hopefully gets rid of the various deprecation warnings we have been seeing lately.
They were up to 56 warnings just for the cmake workflow.
Possibly faster to install when they are all using the same version of Node? IDK.
Some bugs have also been fixed, as well as some new features that we are not yet using.

Notable features I noticed while reading changelogs:

• VS version is selectable feat: support specifying the visual studio version ilammy/msvc-dev-cmd#52
• Release uploader now allows setting release name, etc
• Codecov xcode argument support feat: add xcode support codecov/codecov-action#699
• Codecov gcov argument support Incorporate gcov arguments for the Codecov uploader codecov/codecov-action#688

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 83.06% // Head: 83.07% // Increases project coverage by +0.00% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (a45e61a) compared to base (a395e80).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1428   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    83.06%   83.07%           
========================================
  Files          130      130           
  Lines        10784    10784           
  Branches      2787     2787           
========================================
+ Hits          8958     8959    +1     
- Misses        1131     1133    +2     
+ Partials       695      692    -3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
macos_clang	42.97% <ø> (ø)
macos_gcc	72.87% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_clang	82.26% <ø> (+0.20%)	⬆️
ubuntu_clang_debug	81.77% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_clang_inflate_allow_invalid_dist	81.92% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_clang_inflate_strict	83.30% <ø> (+1.05%)	⬆️
ubuntu_clang_mmap	82.58% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_clang_pigz	13.67% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_clang_pigz_no_optim	11.29% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_clang_pigz_no_threads	13.49% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_clang_reduced_mem	82.75% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc	74.34% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_aarch64	76.63% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_aarch64_compat_no_opt	75.15% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
ubuntu_gcc_aarch64_no_acle	75.63% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_aarch64_no_neon	75.65% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_armhf	76.70% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_armhf_compat_no_opt	75.10% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_armhf_no_acle	76.68% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_armhf_no_neon	76.60% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_armsf	74.06% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_armsf_compat_no_opt	73.60% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_benchmark	72.93% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_compat_no_opt	76.15% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_compat_sprefix	72.78% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_m32	72.40% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_mingw_i686	73.20% <ø> (+0.59%)	⬆️
ubuntu_gcc_mingw_x86_64	72.65% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_no_avx2	73.64% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_no_ctz	74.15% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_no_ctzll	74.18% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_no_pclmulqdq	73.53% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_no_sse2	73.82% <ø> (+0.03%)	⬆️
ubuntu_gcc_no_sse4	74.17% <ø> (+0.69%)	⬆️
ubuntu_gcc_o1	74.06% <ø> (+0.69%)	⬆️
ubuntu_gcc_osb	∅ <ø> (∅)
ubuntu_gcc_pigz	38.12% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️
ubuntu_gcc_pigz_aarch64	39.44% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️
ubuntu_gcc_ppc	73.30% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_ppc64	73.77% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_ppc64le	73.85% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_ppc_no_power8	74.08% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_s390x	74.26% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_s390x_dfltcc	71.46% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_s390x_dfltcc_compat	73.38% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_s390x_no_crc32	74.04% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_sparc64	74.28% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_sprefix	72.44% <ø> (ø)
win64_gcc	73.07% <ø> (ø)
win64_gcc_compat_no_opt	74.21% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
gzlib.c	70.60% <0.00%> (ø)
test/minideflate.c	45.22% <0.00%> (ø)
trees.c	92.26% <0.00%> (+0.24%)	⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[nmoinvaz]

It is nice to know about the codecov gcov args. Right now we are calling gcovr ourselves and creating the report before sending it to codecov.

[Dead2]

It is nice to know about the codecov gcov args. Right now we are calling gcovr ourselves and creating the report before sending it to codecov.

Yeah, that was my first thought too. I didn't want to go down another rabbit hole right now, but if someone wants to have a look at those items now or later, feel free to.

Codecov uploader has behaved a lot better after you changed the workflow to do gcovr separately it seems, at least I don't tear my hair out over codecov not working all the time anymore. That extra step takes about 3-4s on each run (when GHA is not super-slow like yesterday after the downtime), so I figure about 2, possibly 3 sec of that could be saved if it was done in codecov directly (thus avoiding the extra pip install). Due to parallellism that would finish CI about 10-15sec faster (twice that for my PRs).
So it is not a big priority, more of a nice-have because of the simplification and the little time saved, but only IF it actually works right.

[Dead2]

All CI passes, this will get merged tomorrow morning unless someone objects.