use a custom create_documenter function #10
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
keewis
force-pushed
the
custom-get_documenter
branch
from
0f6df5f
to
3e2ab81
Compare
|
The new sphinx release will include a new |
keewis
force-pushed
the
custom-get_documenter
branch
from
3e2ab81
to
42390cb
Compare
keewis
changed the title
keewis
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
sphinx-doc/sphinx#8038 explores the option to support registering customget_documenterfunctions.sphinxrecently got support for overridingget_documenter(via theAutosummary.create_documentermethod).This can be used to make sure the accessor documenters are chosen if the corresponding template was specified, making it possible to remove / avoid the ugly hack from #6.