Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: schema #652

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 6, 2020
Merged

fix: schema #652

merged 1 commit into from Nov 6, 2020

Conversation

alexander-akait
Copy link
Member

This PR contains a:

  • bugfix
  • new feature
  • code refactor
  • test update
  • typo fix
  • metadata update

Motivation / Use-Case

fix schema

Breaking Changes

Potential yes, but we should force it because a lot of developers do mistakes

Additional Info

No

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 6, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #652 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #652   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.55%   89.55%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines         651      651           
  Branches      181      181           
=======================================
  Hits          583      583           
  Misses         65       65           
  Partials        3        3           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update be9ddcb...78d7453. Read the comment docs.

@alexander-akait alexander-akait merged commit 4e4733d into master Nov 6, 2020
@alexander-akait alexander-akait deleted the fix-schema branch November 6, 2020 13:57
@Shaharif14
Copy link

Yes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants