Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use consistent phrasing for operator creation #674

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 10, 2024

Conversation

inexorabletash
Copy link
Contributor

@inexorabletash inexorabletash commented May 3, 2024

Places that create ops use an inconsistent mixed of simple phrases, camelCase, Title Case, ACRONYMS, and "quoted strings". The most common was camelCase, but the wording can be weird, and the bulk-defined binary/unary/logical/pooling/reduction ops and activations use a "quotedCamelCase", so I went with that.

See #591 (comment) for the most commentary.

Resolves #572


Preview | Diff

Places that create ops use an inconsistent mixed of simple phrases,
camelCase, Title Case, ACRONYMS, and "quoted strings". The most common
was camelCase, but the wording can be weird, and the bulk-defined
binary/unary/logical/pooling/reduction ops and activations use a
"quotedCamelCase", so I went with that.

See webmachinelearning#591 (comment)
for the most commentary.

Resolves webmachinelearning#572
@inexorabletash
Copy link
Contributor Author

Super minor; mostly putting this up so we can close #572 and stop talking about it at the telecons. 😉

@inexorabletash
Copy link
Contributor Author

@zolkis can you take a look? Low priority.

Copy link
Collaborator

@zolkis zolkis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks!

@inexorabletash
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @zolkis !

@huningxin & @fdwr - could you please review and merge if it looks good? Thanks!

index.bs Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@huningxin huningxin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@huningxin huningxin merged commit 587af73 into webmachinelearning:main May 10, 2024
2 checks passed
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2024
SHA: 587af73
Reason: push, by huningxin

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@inexorabletash inexorabletash deleted the op-name-consistency branch May 10, 2024 15:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Synchronously validate input operands/activations
4 participants