New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sanitize numpy generics in keys #4146
Conversation
I was thinking about this and I think we can use
|
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4146 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 82.62% 82.66% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 256 256
Lines 32574 32600 +26
==========================================
+ Hits 26913 26949 +36
+ Misses 5661 5651 -10
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Fixes WB-9464
Description
We allow users to log integers as non top level keys in nested dictionaries, but we didn't allow those integers to be numpy types.
Changes:
Some interesting things to note:
Testing
Unittests and yea tests