make pulling sweeps optional when using public api to query for runs

[kptkin]

Fixes WB-9297

Description

What does the PR do?

This PR allows users to specify if they want to pull the sweeps (when pulling the runs) with the Api.runs method. The default stays True for backward compatibility, however the user could specify Api.runs(..., include_sweeps=False) in case they don't need sweeps and save time. From my simple example it seems to reduce the fetch time by ~3.6-5.9x.

Testing

How was this PR tested?

Manually

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #4186 (72b4de9) into master (dfbcbb7) will increase coverage by 0.14%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 72b4de9 differs from pull request most recent head 85d225c. Consider uploading reports for the commit 85d225c to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4186      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.54%   82.68%   +0.14%     
==========================================
  Files         256      256              
  Lines       32612    32602      -10     
==========================================
+ Hits        26918    26957      +39     
+ Misses       5694     5645      -49     

Flag	Coverage Δ
functest	55.98% <50.00%> (+0.11%)	⬆️
unittest	73.45% <100.00%> (+0.11%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
wandb/apis/public.py	82.58% <100.00%> (+0.28%)	⬆️
wandb/filesync/step_prepare.py	93.67% <0.00%> (-1.27%)	⬇️
wandb/sdk/service/server_sock.py	91.87% <0.00%> (-1.02%)	⬇️
wandb/util.py	87.24% <0.00%> (-0.03%)	⬇️
wandb/sdk/lib/git.py	79.01% <0.00%> (ø)
wandb/integration/tensorboard/monkeypatch.py	90.12% <0.00%> (ø)
wandb/cli/cli.py	68.89% <0.00%> (+0.09%)	⬆️
wandb/sdk/wandb_run.py	91.13% <0.00%> (+0.23%)	⬆️
wandb/sdk/wandb_setup.py	88.94% <0.00%> (+0.50%)	⬆️
... and 4 more

[dmitryduev]

LGTM!

[dmitryduev]

One comment: can we properly test this now?

[kptkin]

One comment: can we properly test this now?

Do you mean performance test? Or that we don’t pull the sweep info?

[dmitryduev]

@kptkin: just that we don't pull in the info