Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes cluster manager is corrupted after merging of hazelcast partition #95

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 20, 2018

Conversation

tsegismont
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #90

The original HZ member uuid is saved as a cluster member attribute.
Consequently, even if HZ changes it during partition merging, HAManager and ClusteredEventBus will keep using the same original uuid.

Note that when member added event is handled by existing cluster nodes, the member attribute may not be saved yet.
In this case, it is safe to use member uuid (at this stage, the member uuid and member attribute are equal).

@tsegismont
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vietj can you please take a look? Thanks

@tsegismont
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vietj the build failed on Travis because it reached max length. Can I go ahead and merge? I'll fix the log verbosity issue in master.

…ast partition

The original HZ member uuid is saved as a cluster member attribute.
Consequently, even if HZ changes it during partition merging, HAManager and ClusteredEventBus will keep using the same original uuid.

Note that when member added event is handled by existing cluster nodes, the member attribute may not be saved yet.
In this case, it is safe to use member uuid (at this stage, the member uuid and member attribute are equal).
@vietj
Copy link
Contributor

vietj commented Sep 20, 2018

+1 for the logs

@tsegismont tsegismont merged commit 7e0932b into vert-x3:master Sep 20, 2018
@pmlopes pmlopes removed the to review label Sep 20, 2018
@tsegismont tsegismont deleted the issue/90 branch September 20, 2018 09:01
@vietj
Copy link
Contributor

vietj commented Sep 20, 2018

@tsegismont +1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants