New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: allow validate object literal (#1378) #2066
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat: allow validate object literal (#1378) #2066
Conversation
a76b8c9
to
3975774
Compare
3975774
to
d4a83be
Compare
a80dcac
to
568f41e
Compare
568f41e
to
4b1c5d5
Compare
fc003a5
to
62fc1f7
Compare
@NoNameProvided sorry if I bother you about this. We need this feature for a project we are working on. Currently we are using a workaround which could be removed after merging the pull request and a release. Do you already know when this pull request can be processed? |
We also require this feature for a project. |
@christian-forgacs can you create a temporary release from your fork? |
62fc1f7
to
54dc120
Compare
@scholz-timo you can use my fork from GitHub. The only thing to do is to install it with this command, build it and move some folders: npm install https://github.com/christian-forgacs/class-validator\#54dc1204fa5c04653ebcd1021d10db4eb243a4c1
cd node_modules/class-validator
npm install
npm run build:cjs && npm run build:es2015 && npm run build:esm5 && npm run build:types && npm run build:umd
mv build/* .
rm -r build node_modules Now you use the fork in your project temporarily 😉 |
54dc120
to
4bc65e0
Compare
Oh I'd like this feature to be merged, looks promising to me |
4bc65e0
to
da36c3c
Compare
da36c3c
to
272b5e1
Compare
272b5e1
to
a6dc431
Compare
a6dc431
to
728e60a
Compare
Description
Add possibility to validate object literal with all decorators inclusive
@ValidateNested
. Base solution for this issue is from flisboac.Checklist
Update index.md
)develop
)npm run prettier:check
passesnpm run lint:check
passesFixes
fixes #1378