[Doc] Correct Order & Explanation on precedence #4004
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lacpandore
changed the title
smnandre
reviewed
Feb 29, 2024
nox-4O4
reviewed
Mar 1, 2024
fabpot
force-pushed
the
add-specification-to-precedence
branch
from
c1e8744
to
01e0b7c
Compare
|
Thank you @lacpandore. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following this issue, i worked on it trying to make it simple and easy to understand
Indeed order of the precedence was not good for
b-and,b-xorandb-and.Code here to understand. I also added additional explanations.