Update devDependencies #42
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Update all-contributors-cli, babel-jest, coveralls and jest to update "request" version which was requiring a version of "hoek" package considered vulnerable. - Set Jests's test environment to "node" to not initialize the new jsdom 11 which is only compatible with node >= 6
2 similar comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
Rebuild
package-lockfile and update a few dev-dependencies (even if no strictly necessary), to update a nested sub dependencies named hawk considered vulnerable by NPM.Version 4.2.1 should be ok, now.
Set Jest's test environment to
nodein order to not initialise JSDOM which is no more compatible with Node 4.Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)
No