RwLock guard lock ref recovery methods, owned guards #3930
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Split off from #3928 which is (now) the same thing just for
Mutex
.Open questions:
Are these the best names?
parking_lot
usesfn mutex()
for its mutex type but does not provide these facilities for its rwlocks.smol
usessource()
which is more general, leading to less variation betweenMutex
andRwLock
.Currently these methods are only provided here for the owned forms of the guards, which is suboptimal as noted in Mutex guard lock ref recovery methods #3928 (comment) . However, providing them for the non-owned forms is not entirely straighrforward: Mutex guard lock ref recovery methods #3928 (comment)