Perform the relicensing to MIT/Apache-2.0 #163
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This performs the relicensing to MIT/Apache-2.0 as discussed in tiny-http#161 (archived link: http://web.archive.org/web/20191009143715/https://github.com/tiny-http/tiny-http/issues/161) Instead of updating the file headers, I just removed them, as the rustc compiler has done the same: rust-lang/rust#57108
frewsxcv
approved these changes
Oct 14, 2019
|
@frewsxcv can it be merged? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This performs the relicensing to MIT/Apache-2.0 as discussed in #161
(archived link: http://web.archive.org/web/20191009143715/https://github.com/tiny-http/tiny-http/issues/161)
Instead of updating the file headers, I just removed them,
as the rustc compiler has done the same: rust-lang/rust#57108
closes #161
Regarding the two missing marks by @spk and @erickt , I'm no lawyer but I think their few contributions are fairly trivial and don't fall under copyright.