Reuse S3 client #138
Open
Reuse S3 client #138
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove the stale label or add a comment, or this PR will be closed in 10 days. You can always re-open if you feel this is something we should still keep working on. Tag @heynemann for more information. |
|
This PR was closed because it has been stale for 10 days with no activity. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves #114
Due to the reuse of S3 clients we significantly increase the response time by around 200ms
I'm not a great python dev, so please bear with me if this is aweful python code