Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor to remove redundant calls to isStandardSyntaxSelector #7687

Conversation

romainmenke
Copy link
Member

Which issue, if any, is this issue related to?

None

Is there anything in the PR that needs further explanation?

isStandardSyntaxRule already calls isStandardSyntaxSelector.
see : https://github.com/stylelint/stylelint/blob/main/lib/utils/isStandardSyntaxRule.mjs#L19

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented May 10, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: c777a92

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@romainmenke romainmenke changed the title refactor to remove redudant calls to isStandardSyntaxSelector Refactor to remove redudant calls to isStandardSyntaxSelector May 10, 2024
@Mouvedia
Copy link
Member

Looks like this is a follow-up of #4483.

@Mouvedia Mouvedia changed the title Refactor to remove redudant calls to isStandardSyntaxSelector Refactor to remove redundant calls to isStandardSyntaxSelector May 10, 2024
@romainmenke romainmenke merged commit 22f2884 into main May 11, 2024
17 checks passed
@romainmenke romainmenke deleted the refactor-to-remove-redundant-calls-to-isStandardSyntaxSelector--courageous-squirrel-monkey-8af49c07aa branch May 11, 2024 07:43
@ybiquitous
Copy link
Member

Nice catch! Thank you 👍🏼

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants