Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add at-rule-property-requirelist #3997

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 3, 2019
Merged

Add at-rule-property-requirelist #3997

merged 1 commit into from Apr 3, 2019

Conversation

cahamilton
Copy link
Member

Which issue, if any, is this issue related to?

Resolves #3985. Adds new rule at-rule-property-requirelist.

Is there anything in the PR that needs further explanation?

Not specifically. Addresses request for new rule, with specs outlined in the discussion here: #3985 (comment). If theres any issues, just let me know!

Copy link
Member

@jeddy3 jeddy3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cahamilton Thanks for this!

Sorry about the delay getting around to reviewing it... I was on holiday.

The PR looks good to me!

@jeddy3 jeddy3 changed the title Add rule: at-rule-property-requirelist Add at-rule-property-requirelist Apr 2, 2019
@jeddy3 jeddy3 mentioned this pull request Apr 2, 2019
6 tasks
Copy link
Member

@hudochenkov hudochenkov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks very good!

@hudochenkov hudochenkov merged commit 6cef518 into master Apr 3, 2019
@hudochenkov hudochenkov deleted the issue-3985 branch April 3, 2019 14:09
@hudochenkov
Copy link
Member

  • Added: at-rule-property-requirelist rule (#3997).

@cahamilton
Copy link
Member Author

@jeddy3 All good mate, hope you had a nice break

@hudochenkov @jeddy3 And thank you both for the review 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants