Skip to content

Deps: upgrade ts-dedent to 2.0 #12901

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 27, 2020
Merged

Deps: upgrade ts-dedent to 2.0 #12901

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 27, 2020

Conversation

tooppaaa
Copy link
Contributor

Issue: none

What I did

upgrade ts-dedent

How to test

ci

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Fails
🚫

Please choose only one of these labels: ["maintenance","dependencies:update"]

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 6524259

@tooppaaa tooppaaa removed the maintenance User-facing maintenance tasks label Oct 24, 2020
@shilman shilman added this to the 6.1 core milestone Oct 25, 2020
Copy link
Member

@shilman shilman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@shilman shilman changed the title Deps: upgrade ts-dedent Deps: upgrade ts-dedent to 2.0 Oct 25, 2020
Copy link
Member

@shilman shilman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@shilman shilman merged commit 9a52c70 into next Oct 27, 2020
@shilman shilman deleted the deps/upgradeTsDedent branch October 27, 2020 09:12
@ndelangen
Copy link
Member

When I upgraded this in chromatic-cli it seemed to have a bug, it didn't surface here?

@ndelangen
Copy link
Member

Do we have a story somewhere that uses this?

@shilman
Copy link
Member

shilman commented Oct 27, 2020

Nope, didn't see anything here. I don't think ts-dedent is used in any stories, just in Storybook itself.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants