Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix autodoc: missing type annotation for variadic and keyword parameters (refs: #6574) #6576

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 2, 2019

Conversation

tk0miya
Copy link
Member

@tk0miya tk0miya commented Jul 13, 2019

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 13, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #6576 into 2.0 will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 93.75%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              2.0    #6576      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.73%   83.73%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files         271      271              
  Lines       40966    40977      +11     
  Branches     5999     6001       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        34304    34314      +10     
- Misses       5334     5335       +1     
  Partials     1328     1328
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
tests/test_util_inspect.py 92.83% <100%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
sphinx/util/inspect.py 72.94% <100%> (+0.51%) ⬆️
tests/typing_test_data.py 59.25% <50%> (-0.36%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 04fbd51...b436760. Read the comment docs.

@tk0miya tk0miya merged commit a01aabe into sphinx-doc:2.0 Aug 2, 2019
@tk0miya tk0miya deleted the 6574_annotation_for_varidic_params branch August 2, 2019 17:54
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 10, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant