Sort keys before looping through them to avoid overwriting values #1718
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Sonny Alves Dias <sonny.dias@superevilmegacorp.com>
|
|
|
👋 Thanks for contributing to Viper! You are awesome! 🎉 A maintainer will take a look at your pull request shortly. 👀 In the meantime: We are working on Viper v2 and we would love to hear your thoughts about what you like or don't like about Viper, so we can improve or fix those issues. ⏰ If you have a couple minutes, please take some time and share your thoughts: https://forms.gle/R6faU74qPRPAzchZ9 📣 If you've already given us your feedback, you can still help by spreading the news, https://twitter.com/sagikazarmark/status/1306904078967074816 Thank you! ❤️ |
sonny-semc
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is to fix the problem described in that issue: #1717
The problem does not appear with go 1.17, but in go 1.21 yes. So while it won't fix anything for go1.17 and slowdown a bit the execution it will fix support for go 1.21.
I used
sort.Stringsto make sure it is compatible with both go 1.17 and go 1.21.