Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove require pflag v1.0.3 #219

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 18, 2019
Merged

Conversation

cfromknecht
Copy link

@cfromknecht cfromknecht commented Sep 17, 2019

Fixes #218

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Sep 17, 2019

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Copy link

@ferhatelmas ferhatelmas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link

@umarcor umarcor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The result is the same as if #206 was merged in first place. BTW, #206 should be closed.

@arcticicestudio
Copy link

Would be great if this could be merged and deployed with a new patch version as soon as possible. I guess this breaks a lot of builds and CI/CD workflows for everyone who's using the -u flag of go get. The only workaround is currently to pin the version to v1.0.2 which is not what you want.

@cfromknecht
Copy link
Author

same here, our CI and merge pipeline are effectively frozen due to this. would be great to resolve as soon as possible without resorting to disabling all checks that depend on this package.

@therealmitchconnors do you have a timeframe in mind?

@skyrocknroll
Copy link

We are struct on this

@smcdonald45
Copy link

smcdonald45 commented Sep 18, 2019

Same here. Can't build our projects.

@refear99
Copy link

Same here @therealmitchconnors

@umarcor
Copy link

umarcor commented Sep 18, 2019

Please, stop posting non-useful comments. You can react to any of the already existing comments, should you want to let maintainers know that this issue is relevant for you.

I guess this breaks a lot of builds and CI/CD workflows for everyone who's using the -u flag of go get.

I assume that anyone who is using go get -u either expects builds to break or is not worried about that happening. A responsible user that does not want builds to break would never use go get -u.

The only workaround is currently to pin the version to v1.0.2 which is not what you want.

What' the issue with v1.0.3 or with any commit before 2019/09/05?

@cfromknecht, @skyrocknroll, @smcdonald45, @refear99, there are idiomatic ways to fix your own builds/projects independently of how long it takes to fix this or other unrelated issues in other dependencies. It'd be good for you to learn and apply those procedures.

@therealmitchconnors therealmitchconnors merged commit 2e9d26c into spf13:master Sep 18, 2019
@cfromknecht cfromknecht deleted the fix-mod branch September 18, 2019 20:18
@cfromknecht
Copy link
Author

I assume that anyone who is using go get -u either expects builds to break or is not worried about that happening. A responsible user that does not want builds to break would never use go get -u.

Thanks for this tip @umarcor, indeed our build script was using -u which was the root cause of the issue. Will also fix this on our end to avoid situations like this in the future!

@umarcor
Copy link

umarcor commented Sep 18, 2019

Thanks for this tip @umarcor, indeed our build script was using -u which was the root cause of the issue. Will also fix this on our end to avoid situations like this in the future!

Note that most CI services will allow you to mark some jobs as allowed to fail. Therefore, apart from fixing your main job, you can keep an additional job with -u. That will allow to detect issues like this fast enough, at the same time that your main build is stable. Then, whenever you want to update your stable job, you just need to pick the latest successful execution of the test job.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

v1.0.4 Has a Broken Path
9 participants