chore: use scip-go instead of lsif-go for precise indexing in CI #64
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Strum355
force-pushed
the
nsc/lsifgo-to-scipgo
branch
from
b1dbd2d
to
f129f1f
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #64 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 62.73% 62.73%
=======================================
Files 16 16
Lines 628 628
=======================================
Hits 394 394
Misses 212 212
Partials 22 22 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Strum355
force-pushed
the
nsc/lsifgo-to-scipgo
branch
from
f129f1f
to
1518dca
Compare
BolajiOlajide
approved these changes
Feb 23, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Does what it says on the tin
Test plan
scip-go GHA passes
Created by Sourcegraph batch change
Strum355/lsif-go_to_scip-go.