Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add is_enterprise_install flag for org wide installation support #1225

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 10, 2024

Conversation

hussachai
Copy link
Contributor

Introducing the inclusion of the 'is_enterprise_install' parameter in commands, interactions, and oauth2 responses. This flag is essential for facilitating organization-wide installations within the enterprise grid environment. Without this flag, the authentication token mapping process becomes unreliable, as it necessitates attempts with both the enterprise ID and team ID, potentially resulting in unexpected outcomes.

Pull Request Guidelines

These are recommendations for pull requests.
They are strictly guidelines to help manage expectations.

PR preparation

Run make pr-prep from the root of the repository to run formatting, linting and tests.

Should this be an issue instead
  • is it a convenience method? (no new functionality, streamlines some use case)
  • exposes a previously private type, const, method, etc.
  • is it application specific (caching, retry logic, rate limiting, etc)
  • is it performance related.
API changes

Since API changes have to be maintained they undergo a more detailed review and are more likely to require changes.

  • no tests, if you're adding to the API include at least a single test of the happy case.
  • If you can accomplish your goal without changing the API, then do so.
  • dependency changes. updates are okay. adding/removing need justification.
Examples of API changes that do not meet guidelines:
  • in library cache for users. caches are use case specific.
  • Convenience methods for Sending Messages, update, post, ephemeral, etc. consider opening an issue instead.

Copy link
Member

@parsley42 parsley42 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@parsley42
Copy link
Member

@lololozhkin Any objections? Care to add a review?

@parsley42
Copy link
Member

Sorry slow to get this in; appears to be more complete than #1255

@parsley42 parsley42 merged commit fd5d171 into slack-go:master Feb 10, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants