Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Actually remove thin from server selection #1830

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

felixonmars
Copy link
Contributor

After #1624 thin is still left in this block, which keeps it the most preferred server in regular Ruby. Let's remove it for real this time.

After sinatra#1624 `thin` is still left in this block, which keeps it the most preferred server in regular Ruby. Let's remove it for real this time.
@felixonmars
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oops, I misread that issue. I still have the question about whether thin should be the most preferred server though, even with falcon/puma installed.

@jkowens
Copy link
Member

jkowens commented Oct 26, 2022

@felixonmars yeah I think we have the list backwards.

@jkowens
Copy link
Member

jkowens commented Dec 15, 2022

It was decided to keep thin support since it appears it is once again getting some support. I do think it should be the first server in the server list, giving puma and falcon priority, but I wouldn't introduce that change until v4.

@felixonmars
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jkowens I see. Thanks for clarifying!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants