Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix package comment #290

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 21, 2024
Merged

Fix package comment #290

merged 1 commit into from Feb 21, 2024

Conversation

furusax0621
Copy link
Sponsor Collaborator

@furusax0621 furusax0621 commented Feb 19, 2024

The goaslog package should describe how to initialize loggers using log/slog, but currently it uses logrus.
I fixed it.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated the logging backend to enhance performance and reliability.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 19, 2024

Walkthrough

This change signifies a shift in logging strategy within the goaslog package, transitioning from the logrus to the slog logger framework. This adjustment aims to configure the logger backend in a service, enhancing logging capabilities and potentially offering improvements in performance, usability, or feature set.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
logging/slog/adapter.go Switched logging from logrus to slog in goaslog package.

🐇✨
In the realm of code, a rabbit hopped,
From logrus fields to slog it swapped.
With every line, it left a trace,
A leap towards efficiency, with grace.
In logs, it found a brand new space.
🌟🐾

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8fd03a5 and a8b9e86.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • logging/slog/adapter.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 6
logging/slog/adapter.go (6)
  • 9-11: The example usage in the documentation correctly demonstrates initializing the goaslog logger with slog. This change aligns with the PR's objective to guide developers towards using log/slog instead of logrus. It's crucial to ensure that the rest of the documentation throughout the project is updated to reflect this change if not already done.
  • 6-14: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [19-21]

The import statement for log/slog is correctly added, ensuring that the adapter uses the intended logging library. This change is essential for the adapter's functionality to align with the PR's objectives. It's also important to remove any logrus imports if they are no longer needed, although such changes are not visible in the provided diff.

  • 6-14: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [29-31]

The adapter struct definition is concise and clearly associates the slog.Handler with the adapter. This struct serves as the foundation for integrating slog with the goa framework, ensuring that logging calls within goa can be redirected to slog. The implementation appears to be straightforward and maintainable.

  • 6-14: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [33-35]

The logging functions (Info, InfoContext, Warn, WarnContext, Error, ErrorContext) are correctly implemented to use slog for logging. Each function appropriately handles context and logging levels, ensuring that the adapter can be used seamlessly within the goa framework. It's important to ensure that these functions are thoroughly tested, especially to verify that context and logging levels are handled as expected.

Also applies to: 37-39, 41-43, 45-47, 49-51, 53-55

  • 6-14: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [57-71]

The New function implementation for creating a new logger instance with additional data is well-designed. It demonstrates a good understanding of slog's API, particularly in handling attributes. This function enhances the adapter's flexibility by allowing the creation of new logger instances with pre-defined attributes, which can be very useful in a structured logging context. It's recommended to add examples or documentation on how to use this function effectively.

  • 6-14: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [73-91]

The log function is the core of the adapter, handling the actual logging operation. The use of runtime.Callers to capture the caller's PC (Program Counter) is a sophisticated approach to include call site information in the logs. This detail is valuable for debugging. However, it's crucial to ensure that the offset passed to runtime.Callers (currently 4) is accurate, considering the call stack depth might vary based on how the logging functions are structured or if they are wrapped. Testing or documenting the rationale behind choosing this offset would be beneficial for maintainability.

Copy link
Owner

@shogo82148 shogo82148 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ヨシッ

@shogo82148 shogo82148 merged commit a406ca2 into main Feb 21, 2024
17 checks passed
@shogo82148 shogo82148 deleted the fix-goaslog-package-comment branch February 21, 2024 01:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants