Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement XMLSerializer interface #23044

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2019
Merged

Implement XMLSerializer interface #23044

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2019

Conversation

georgeroman
Copy link
Contributor

@georgeroman georgeroman commented Mar 15, 2019



This change is Reviewable

@highfive
Copy link

Heads up! This PR modifies the following files:

  • @asajeffrey: components/script/dom/xmlserializer.rs, components/script/dom/webidls/XMLSerializer.webidl, components/script/dom/mod.rs
  • @KiChjang: components/script/dom/xmlserializer.rs, components/script/dom/webidls/XMLSerializer.webidl, components/script/dom/mod.rs

@highfive highfive added the S-awaiting-review There is new code that needs to be reviewed. label Mar 15, 2019
@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Mar 18, 2019

I have filed servo/html5ever#368 about implementing the full XML serialization algorithm, which should allow the remaining tests to pass. That's a lot of work, though, and I won't prevent these changes from landing until it's done. Thanks!

@bors-servo r+

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

📌 Commit c8ebb40 has been approved by jdm

@highfive highfive assigned jdm and unassigned Manishearth Mar 18, 2019
@highfive highfive added S-awaiting-merge The PR is in the process of compiling and running tests on the automated CI. and removed S-awaiting-review There is new code that needs to be reviewed. labels Mar 18, 2019
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #22891) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@highfive highfive removed the S-awaiting-merge The PR is in the process of compiling and running tests on the automated CI. label Mar 18, 2019
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

🔒 Merge conflict

@highfive highfive added S-needs-rebase There are merge conflict errors. S-awaiting-review There is new code that needs to be reviewed. labels Mar 18, 2019
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #23051) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Mar 21, 2019

Ack, sorry for not noticing this was ready to merge.

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Mar 21, 2019

@bors-servo delegate+

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

✌️ @georgeroman can now approve this pull request

@georgeroman
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors-servo r=jdm

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

📌 Commit c6433ef has been approved by jdm

@highfive highfive added S-awaiting-merge The PR is in the process of compiling and running tests on the automated CI. and removed S-awaiting-review There is new code that needs to be reviewed. S-needs-rebase There are merge conflict errors. labels Mar 21, 2019
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

⌛ Testing commit c6433ef with merge c2357f6...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2019
Implement XMLSerializer interface

<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->

---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix  #22997

<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->

<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/23044)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

💔 Test failed - status-taskcluster

@highfive highfive added S-tests-failed The changes caused existing tests to fail. and removed S-awaiting-merge The PR is in the process of compiling and running tests on the automated CI. labels Mar 21, 2019
@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Mar 21, 2019

@bors-servo retry

  • Network issue

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

⌛ Testing commit c6433ef with merge 4e0b483...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2019
Implement XMLSerializer interface

<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->

---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix  #22997

<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->

<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/23044)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@highfive highfive added S-awaiting-merge The PR is in the process of compiling and running tests on the automated CI. and removed S-tests-failed The changes caused existing tests to fail. labels Mar 21, 2019
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

💔 Test failed - mac-rel-wpt2

@highfive highfive added S-tests-failed The changes caused existing tests to fail. and removed S-awaiting-merge The PR is in the process of compiling and running tests on the automated CI. labels Mar 21, 2019
@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Mar 21, 2019

@bors-servo retry

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

💣 Failed to start rebuilding: Unknown error

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

⌛ Testing commit c6433ef with merge ba92920...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2019
Implement XMLSerializer interface

<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->

---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix  #22997

<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->

<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/23044)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@highfive highfive added S-awaiting-merge The PR is in the process of compiling and running tests on the automated CI. and removed S-tests-failed The changes caused existing tests to fail. labels Mar 21, 2019
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

☀️ Test successful - android-mac, arm32, arm64, linux-rel-css, linux-rel-wpt, mac-rel-css1, mac-rel-css2, mac-rel-wpt1, mac-rel-wpt2, mac-rel-wpt3, mac-rel-wpt4, magicleap, status-taskcluster
Approved by: jdm
Pushing ba92920 to master...

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit c6433ef into servo:master Mar 21, 2019
@highfive highfive removed the S-awaiting-merge The PR is in the process of compiling and running tests on the automated CI. label Mar 21, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

XMLSerializer interface is missing
5 participants