Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

migrate babel-eslint to @babel/eslint-parser #65

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

dan753722
Copy link

@dan753722 dan753722 commented Oct 28, 2021

Removed babel-eslint
Added @babel/eslint-parser and its dependency @babel/core and its rule companion @babel/eslint-plugin

As part of the eslint8 support changes mentioned in #62

'eslint-config-seek': minor
---

migrated babel-eslint to @babel/eslint-parser
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we provide more context here? For example, are there any changes/gotchas in the parser that consumers should be aware of?

extends: [
'plugin:css-modules/recommended',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This appears to be confuddled with #64. Can you rebase this PR on the default branch and only include the Babel changes?

@@ -100,9 +101,8 @@ const baseConfig = {
version: '>16',
},
},
plugins: ['react', 'react-hooks', 'css-modules'],
plugins: ['react', 'react-hooks', '@babel'],
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like we didn't declare this plugin before. What are the implications of adding it?

@72636c
Copy link
Member

72636c commented Mar 22, 2022

Stale and superseded by #73

@72636c 72636c closed this Mar 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants