Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhancement: Use in_array() #3281

Merged

Conversation

localheinz
Copy link
Collaborator

@localheinz localheinz commented Sep 8, 2018

This PR

  • uses in_array() to validate order

A tiny bit related to #3284.

💁‍♂️ The idea is to make it easier to add other order options, when we want to, perhaps fastest first?

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Sep 8, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #3281 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #3281      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     82.11%   82.12%   +<.01%     
+ Complexity     3486     3483       -3     
============================================
  Files           140      140              
  Lines          9210     9215       +5     
============================================
+ Hits           7563     7568       +5     
  Misses         1647     1647
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
src/Runner/TestSuiteSorter.php 100% <100%> (ø) 40 <0> (-3) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 952160e...003570e. Read the comment docs.

@sebastianbergmann sebastianbergmann merged commit 29ea502 into sebastianbergmann:master Sep 8, 2018
@localheinz localheinz deleted the feature/in-array branch September 8, 2018 09:19
@localheinz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thank you, @sebastianbergmann!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants