Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MNT remove author and license in GLM files #28799

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lorentzenchr
Copy link
Member

@lorentzenchr lorentzenchr commented Apr 9, 2024

Reference Issues/PRs

Partially addresses #20813.

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

I best start with my own authorship and remove all those info from GLMs.

Any other comments?

An alternative #20813 (comment) to removing is

# Authors: The scikit-learn developers.
# License: BSD 3 clause

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2024

✔️ Linting Passed

All linting checks passed. Your pull request is in excellent shape! ☀️

Generated for commit: 4f1eefd. Link to the linter CI: here

@lorentzenchr lorentzenchr added No Changelog Needed Quick Review For PRs that are quick to review labels Apr 10, 2024
Copy link
Member

@adrinjalali adrinjalali left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've been thinking about this as well, I very much like this change!

# Authors: The scikit-learn developers
# License: BSD 3 clause
@adrinjalali
Copy link
Member

I think I'm missing something, did we decide on the standard header?

@lorentzenchr
Copy link
Member Author

I'm missing something, did we decide on the standard header?

See discussion in #20813 (comment).

@adrinjalali
Copy link
Member

@thomasjpfan WDYT?

@thomasjpfan
Copy link
Member

My big concern is still #20813 (comment)

I like the end goal of having a simplified header, but I feel uneasy about removing the authors.

@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
# Authors: The scikit-learn developers
# License: BSD 3 clause
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think going with this suggestion makes sense: #20813 (comment)

Suggested change
# License: BSD 3 clause
# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't mind, then we can update the blog for this as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants