New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactored Code #1831
base: 3.1.x
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Refactored Code #1831
Conversation
Used scala type safety Improved multiline comments
@cla-bot[bot] check |
Hi @tgamjyoti, we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't have yours on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please access https://www.artima.com/cla/choose-type to sign our Contributor License Agreement. Your effort is highly appreciated. Thank you. |
The cla-bot has been summoned, and re-checked this pull request! |
Hi @tgamjyoti, we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't have yours on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please access https://www.artima.com/cla/choose-type to sign our Contributor License Agreement. Your effort is highly appreciated. Thank you. |
I have signed the certificate. It's still showing cross on the check. |
@cla-bot[bot] check |
Hi @tgamjyoti, we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't have yours on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please access https://www.artima.com/cla/choose-type to sign our Contributor License Agreement. Your effort is highly appreciated. Thank you. |
The cla-bot has been summoned, and re-checked this pull request! |
Used scala type safety
Improved multiline comments
Added missing type annotations