Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Travis-CI: upgrade to bionic broke merge builds #756

Closed
SethTisue opened this issue Dec 11, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by scala/scala#9384
Closed

Travis-CI: upgrade to bionic broke merge builds #756

SethTisue opened this issue Dec 11, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by scala/scala#9384

Comments

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

SethTisue commented Dec 11, 2020

PR validation builds aren't affected, which is why this wasn't caught before scala/scala#7432 was merged

btw I did check that bionic is an upgrade, not a downgrade. bionic is ubuntu 18, xenial was ubuntu 16. so I think this isn't wasted work as we'd likely need to upgrade eventually

GitHub Actions has already been on 18 for a while and is presently moving to 20, as per actions/runner-images#1816

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member Author

SethTisue commented Dec 11, 2020

@lrytz is looking into it:

the jobs end with $ (cd admin && ./init.sh), which does
sensitive() {
... perl ...
... openssl ...
}
sensitive >/dev/null 2>&1
so probably one of these commands is failing
i pushed this to a branch > scala/scala@708367b
https://travis-ci.org/github/scala/scala/jobs/749052208 (edited)
the output is truncated, but there's some message at the end WARNING : deprecated key derivation that comes from openssl
openssl went from 1.0 to 1.1 https://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/openssl > https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/openssl
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1093591/how-should-i-change-encryption-according-to-warning-deprecated-key-derivat
maybe this https://stackoverflow.com/questions/39637388/encryption-decryption-doesnt-work-well-between-two-different-openssl-versions
testing with -md md5 https://travis-ci.org/github/scala/scala/builds/749073379

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants