Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Function Units] Add a proposal #3375

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Aug 19, 2022
Merged

[Function Units] Add a proposal #3375

merged 3 commits into from Aug 19, 2022

Conversation

nex3
Copy link
Contributor

@nex3 nex3 commented Aug 13, 2022

See #3374

@nex3 nex3 requested a review from jathak August 13, 2022 00:06

* The `$n` parameter to `list.nth()` and `list.set-nth()` may not have units.

### Decision Decisions
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a reason for the repetition here or is this supposed to say something else?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's supposed to be "Design Decisions" 😆

@nex3 nex3 merged commit 8228f43 into main Aug 19, 2022
@nex3 nex3 deleted the proposal.function-units branch August 19, 2022 22:30
mirisuzanne added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2022
* main: (41 commits)
  [Function Units] Add a proposal (#3375)
  Mark accepted: Random with Units Proposal (#3377)
  Note configurations are shared across all files in a module by instance given a uniquely-identifying opaque ID (#3357)
  Clarify that compile and compileString accept optional options (#3373)
  Proposal: Define random() behavior for numbers with units (#3361)
  [Media Logic] Apply changes to the spec (#3365)
  [Reconfigurable Modules] Apply the proposal to the spec (#3364)
  [Media Logic] Mark as accepted (#3360)
  [Bogus Combinators] Update the specification (#3362)
  Update documentation for charset option (#3358)
  Define "useless selectors" in Phase 1
  Support complex selectors composed of only a single combinator
  Throw an error for an @extend rule with a bogus extender or target
  Don't throw an error for bogus style rules with no children
  Only omit style rules if _all_ of their complex selectors are bogus
  Allow bogus selectors in `selector.append()`
  Support single leading combinators in Phase 1
  Clarify the definition of bogus selectors in Phase 2
  Update the timeline for the deprecation and removal of `@import` (#3354)
  Mark the bogus combinators proposal as accepted
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants