Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal: Define random() behavior for numbers with units #3361

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jul 22, 2022
Merged

Conversation

Goodwine
Copy link
Member

@Goodwine Goodwine force-pushed the random-units branch 2 times, most recently from 9b3f79e to 0fd3fca Compare July 20, 2022 22:43
proposal/random-with-units.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
proposal/random-with-units.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
proposal/random-with-units.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
proposal/random-with-units.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
proposal/random-with-units.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
proposal/random-with-units.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
proposal/random-with-units.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
proposal/random-with-units.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
proposal/random-with-units.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
proposal/random-with-units.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Goodwine Goodwine requested a review from nex3 July 21, 2022 21:15
proposal/random-with-units.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
proposal/random-with-units.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
proposal/random-with-units.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
proposal/random-with-units.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Goodwine Goodwine merged commit 72909c9 into main Jul 22, 2022
@Goodwine Goodwine deleted the random-units branch July 22, 2022 21:52
mirisuzanne added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2022
* main: (41 commits)
  [Function Units] Add a proposal (#3375)
  Mark accepted: Random with Units Proposal (#3377)
  Note configurations are shared across all files in a module by instance given a uniquely-identifying opaque ID (#3357)
  Clarify that compile and compileString accept optional options (#3373)
  Proposal: Define random() behavior for numbers with units (#3361)
  [Media Logic] Apply changes to the spec (#3365)
  [Reconfigurable Modules] Apply the proposal to the spec (#3364)
  [Media Logic] Mark as accepted (#3360)
  [Bogus Combinators] Update the specification (#3362)
  Update documentation for charset option (#3358)
  Define "useless selectors" in Phase 1
  Support complex selectors composed of only a single combinator
  Throw an error for an @extend rule with a bogus extender or target
  Don't throw an error for bogus style rules with no children
  Only omit style rules if _all_ of their complex selectors are bogus
  Allow bogus selectors in `selector.append()`
  Support single leading combinators in Phase 1
  Clarify the definition of bogus selectors in Phase 2
  Update the timeline for the deprecation and removal of `@import` (#3354)
  Mark the bogus combinators proposal as accepted
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants