-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(release): releasing 2.0.0 manually #274
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #274 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 100% 100%
=====================================
Files 9 9
Lines 209 209
=====================================
Hits 209 209 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
As already mentioned elsewhere, the automatic sematic-release process is broken. To get #237 released (and to eventually get #270 merged and released) I had to do a manual release. Pushing the changes directly is blocked, therefore this PR, which requires a review ( @sarbbottam @ljharb I summon you ... please help — and finally approve 😜 ). I'd also suggest to make a clean up after bringing #270 out the door, and to stay with manually releasing (as iirc we already concluded) ... |
Since we are transpiling into `dist`, that directory s required to be included within the package, but `src` and `test` are not.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't want to block the release, but big -1 on npmignoring src/tests.
node_modules/ | ||
.nyc_output/ | ||
coverage/ | ||
src/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i'm really not a fan of npmignoring src or tests - imo both things should always be published so that npm explore foo && npm install && npm test
always works.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is an absolutely valid point, thank's for bringing that on the table. I'll change that back soon.
Due to a hickup in the automatic release setup, we have to go back to manually releasing (at least version 2.0.0).