Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(eslint-bod): support eslint v8 #247

Closed
sabertazimi opened this issue Oct 10, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #242
Closed

feat(eslint-bod): support eslint v8 #247

sabertazimi opened this issue Oct 10, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #242
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request todo 🗒️
Projects

Comments

@sabertazimi
Copy link
Owner

sabertazimi commented Oct 10, 2021

No description provided.

@sabertazimi sabertazimi added enhancement New feature or request todo 🗒️ labels Oct 10, 2021
@sabertazimi sabertazimi self-assigned this Oct 10, 2021
@sabertazimi sabertazimi added this to To do in v5.0.0 via automation Oct 10, 2021
@sabertazimi sabertazimi moved this from To do to In progress in v5.0.0 Oct 10, 2021
@sabertazimi sabertazimi linked a pull request Oct 10, 2021 that will close this issue
1 task
sabertazimi added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 14, 2021
No need for `flowtype` eslint checking due to `@ts-check`.

issue #247.
PR #242.
sabertazimi added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 14, 2021
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 14, 2021
No need for `flowtype` eslint checking due to `@ts-check`.

issue #247.
PR #242. 4e2a2e4
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 14, 2021
sabertazimi added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 14, 2021
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 14, 2021
v5.0.0 automation moved this from In progress to Done Oct 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request todo 🗒️
Projects
No open projects
v5.0.0
  
Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant