chore(deps): update actions/upload-artifact digest to 6546280

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
actions/upload-artifact	action	digest	5d5d22a -> 6546280

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review Skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

There's only one significant change visible in this diff, which is the hash identifier of the artifact upload action version. It seems to be part of a workflow which sends coverage data after tests are done. Assuming the referenced hash correlates with the correct version update, there does not appear to be any key concerns with the script.

[codecov]

Ensure that the hash '1746f4ab65b179e0ea60a494b83293b640dd5bba' indeed corresponds to the correct (or updated) version of 'actions/upload-artifact'. Make sure it contains necessary fixes or updates for this project's workflow.

[deepsource-io]

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 363db56..01b251d. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
JavaScript	✅ Success		View Check ↗

---

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

[codecov]

The code changes appear to update the version of the artifact upload action. This is an important update as it could affect how the artifacts of the job are uploaded. However, it's also necessary to verify the details of the updated version to ensure that it doesn't introduce breaking changes or undesired effects. Add clarity in versioning or describe the reason for the changes in the commit message.

[codecov]

The hash used isn't expressive of the version being used which can cause confusion. It might be better to use tags to reference the version if possible. That way, anyone reading the code can know what version is being used without needing to check the repository of the action.

[codecov]

The code change involves updating the version of the actions/upload-artifact action used in the GitHub actions workflow. The change seems overall appropriate but a bit vague. It is crucial to give the reason for the version change in the commit message or a comment.

[codecov]

This line changes the version of the 'actions/upload-artifact' GitHub Action by specifying a new git commit hash. These types of changes are generally required to keep dependencies up-to-date or to use new features or bug fixes offered by newer releases. Assuming the new version of the action is compatible and has been tested with the rest of your CI/CD setup, there are no code quality issues identified here.

[codecov]

I would advise against using the hash value of the action version. It would be better if you use the version tag instead (e.g., 'v4') if available, as it is more readable and maintainable.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 9.74%. Comparing base (363db56) to head (01b251d).

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main   #1897   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   9.74%   9.74%           
=====================================
  Files        133     133           
  Lines       9730    9730           
  Branches     140     139    -1     
=====================================
  Hits         948     948           
  Misses      8782    8782           

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
cli	0.00% <ø> (ø)
connection	25.66% <ø> (ø)
database	9.70% <ø> (ø)
gateway	41.48% <ø> (ø)
mcots	0.00% <ø> (ø)
nps	0.00% <ø> (ø)
patch	86.08% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 363db56
schema	0.00% <ø> (ø)
shard	41.47% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 363db56
shared	13.44% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 363db56
shared-packets	0.00% <ø> (ø)

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[codecov]

CodecovAI submitted a new review for cf4d4f9

[codecov]

While not directly related to the changes made, it would be recommendable to move 'matrix.node-version' and other commonly used values to environment variables in the GitHub Actions workflow. This would simplify future changes and improve code readability.

[codecov]

CodecovAI submitted a new review for c8d267d

[codecov]

Ensure the new version supports the current fields like 'name' and 'path'. Compatibility issues may arise if the new version of the actions/upload-artifact action makes changes to how parameters are used.

[codecov]

CodecovAI submitted a new review for 03e28af

[codecov]

You have changed the version of 'upload-artifact' action. Please ensure that the new version does not introduce any breaking changes or any behavior that could affect the execution of your workflow. Also, please add a line comment explaining the importance or benefits of this version change if any.

[codecov]

CodecovAI submitted a new review for 03e28af

[codecov]

You've updated the 'actions/upload-artifact' used in the workflow from 5d5d22a31266ced268874388b861e4b58bb5c2f3 to 65462800fd760344b1a7b4382951275a0abb4808. It can be very helpful for future maintenance and anyone working on this code to add a comment outlining why this update was necessary (bug fix, added functionality, performance benefits etc.). This can typically be included in the Git commit message.

[codecov]

The code review suggests that there has been an update with the actions/upload-artifact GitHub Action. Make sure to test any dependent functionalities to ensure that this updated version does not introduce any breaking changes or bugs. However, they do provide stable actions in the v4 branch.

[codecov]

It's generally recommended to use version tags for Github actions rather than commit hashes. This enhances readability and assures the usage of stable release. However, if this commit hash has particular essential fixes for your use-case that are not available in stable releases, then it's justifiable to use hash. Just make sure this is the correct hash you intended to use.

[codecov]

CodecovAI submitted a new review for 4d9cbd5

[codecov]

You can make sure you're referencing the correct version of actions/upload-artifact. Comments say it's version 4, but you changed the hash. If the new hash is a new version, you should also update the comment to reflect this change.

[codecov]

CodecovAI submitted a new review for 4d9cbd5

[codecov]

Earlier version of the 'actions/upload-artifact' was used here. If there isn't a driven purpose, updating any internal dependencies without needs may introduce unexpected behaviors or bugs.

[codecov]

CodecovAI submitted a new review for e50f7d5

[codecov]

It can be beneficial to provide a descriptive name for these flags used in the codecov CLI. Using descriptive flag names can make the code more readable and maintainable, since it gives other developers an insight into why the specific flags are used.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud