Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test using cargo-careful #1371

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 9, 2024
Merged

Test using cargo-careful #1371

merged 1 commit into from Mar 9, 2024

Conversation

bluss
Copy link
Member

@bluss bluss commented Mar 9, 2024

Suggested by @adamreichold.

I think we could test with miri too, the problem is that it's very slow.

@bluss bluss changed the title ci: Test using cargo-careful Test using cargo-careful Mar 9, 2024
@bluss bluss marked this pull request as ready for review March 9, 2024 20:16
@bluss
Copy link
Member Author

bluss commented Mar 9, 2024

@adamreichold
Copy link
Collaborator

I think we could test with miri too, the problem is that it's very slow.

My understanding was that Miri would not handling calling into BLAS et al.

@bluss
Copy link
Member Author

bluss commented Mar 9, 2024

I see. It's been attempted before, such as by jturner in commit 784a9a8 apparently. He added a miri runner in matrixmultiply at least, but we don't have it here.

@bluss bluss added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 9, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit 0598508 Mar 9, 2024
8 checks passed
@bluss bluss deleted the cargo-careful branch March 9, 2024 21:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants